Matthew Green

@matthew_d_green @kyletorpey This is bullshit You come to the party at dessert time warning about the dangers of sugar when meal was poison

@BitcoinBelle @kyletorpey ?

@matthew_d_green @kyletorpey There is no "if" & "when" to fear out there. It's right here and has been. You're insulated. Get out a bit prof

@matthew_d_green @kyletorpey But suddenly noooooww, the govt having access to your porn views, sext msgs, wife's nagging is a deal? Hmm.

@BitcoinBelle @matthew_d_green not your best work. you can troll better than this.

@matthew_d_green @Snowden First, let's call it what it is... speak clearly the better to be heard legally. http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Microsoft_and_the_NSA …

.@5uger9lum @matthew_d_green Put another way, the likelihood you'd get blackmailed by China as a European in #uk slimmer than by #gchq

@schestowitz @matthew_d_green We must not get distracted with what the world could do, focus on u.s., there are 17 I.A.s!!!

@matthew_d_green Isn't the real issue that Apple holds critical privileged keys in the first place? Judge isn't asking for a crypto backdoor

@matthew_d_green Tim Cook seems be obfuscating the fact that Apple has privileged keys by pretending it's about new FBI crypto backdoors.

@landonfuller @matthew_d_green Apple makes the hardware. Who else would hold the private keys?

@landonfuller @matthew_d_green The Secure Element makes this question moot on recent hardware, regardless. This is about legal precedent.

@djspiewak @matthew_d_green What legal precedent? That valid writs are valid? Apple *has* privileged keys.

@landonfuller @matthew_d_green Scope of All Writs has far greater import than the signing keys.

@djspiewak @matthew_d_green Doesn't this obfuscate the real problem and ensure the next request/coercion may not be so public?