U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Reading this article on Plasma, it’s amazing to me that people started coding this thing up — when problems like this existed and were unsolved. https://medium.com/dragonfly-research/the-life-and-death-of-plasma-b72c6a59c5ad …pic.twitter.com/QkVUv271h1
There’s a lot of magical thinking in the cryptocurrency scaling debate. It’s like everyone is focused on perfecting one isolated part of the problem (“Visa level transaction rates”) without realizing they’re just shifting all the burden to another part of the system.
That doesn't sound right. So in NOCUST or MVP, if one person can prove the block is invalid or data was not made available by the operator, then the block is forfeited and the system rolls back to the previous one. The service stops and all withdrawals proceed as normal.
So the big issue is more to do with: is the onchain challenge approach for data availability too big an assumption? eg of operator is nasty, it'll flood chain with challenges and operator must respond to all of them.
These are people that consider 70% centralized medium of incentives statistically insignificant. Rule of thumb is if they were capable of even extremely basic logic, they would not be working on Ethereum in the first place.pic.twitter.com/qQgPp6wgGe
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
