when the "days since last segmentation fault" counter finally reaches 1, maybe we can start to consider the possibility of being able to implement this safely
-
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
At least it’s not ECB - or even worse the horror protocol I wrote for an assignment at uni (to be fair the course was essentially RSA and implementation of big ints, and not so much how to not produce catastrophically broken crypto)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If only we all were offered $10M Then nobody would have told!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It's slightly better than eNull
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
and quantum computers breaking Bitcoin sha 256... Derpy derp derp : expected result : quantum encryption
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
tbh that argument is a bit like saying that if physicists argued less and grinded more we'd have an FTL drive. It's not just that we don't have implementation "chops" needed, "safe backdoors" are likely physically impossible
-
No this is actually the case about ftl shut up my dreams are valid
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Tolles was the original opener of back doors. How come you never mention that?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.