Story I’ve heard is that new employees at a company that rhymes with “Placetook” are told that if someone ever threatens their lives or their families’ lives over data, just to give it to them.
-
-
Show this thread
-
The reason being (and this story is some years out of date, so it may be better now) that any dev in this company’s engineering group could spin up a VM with full access to all customer data and essentially minimal logging.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for this ! Can you send me the source please ? It's very interesting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also: don't hire, promote, or retain employees whose values would be compatible with doing that.
-
how is it about "values" of employees? I doubt that values would help almost anyone if an intelligence service goes after that person; imho it should be more about efficient measures of protection for such people.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Saudi owns twitter tho?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m searching for a way to discuss these foundational issues of privacy/control so they aren’t immediately binned as alarmist crackpottery or dismissed with a *shrug* “it’ll blow over” Not merely a twitter/FB issue… It’s a CS/telecom issue with profound impacts on civilization.
-
Here's my best attempt at expressing it concisely. Feedback encouraged:https://danielnorman.com/blog/2018/9/22/key-insights-on-knowledge-graphs-and-human-transcendence …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.