2/ Their two anecdotes: [hillary clinton in] didn't suggest [hillary clinton indictment] & [hillary clinton cri] didn't suggest crimes.
-
-
-
3/ It turns out that lots of people searching for negative things about HRC search for [hillary X], not [hillary clinton X]
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@BenedictEvans@sourcefed "actively?" -
Right? Like we're watching billions of searches come in & tweaking individual results. Dude, we're kind busy! :)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
handling isn't different. Query mix is likely to differ though: critic vs. fan, or how people search for HRC internationally, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the screenshots on Vox can be verified yourself. Or see e.g. http://frontrowseatatthecircus.com/2016/06/google-manipulation-story-false/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you're welcome to not trust me. But you can go to Google & type [hillary i] and see indictment as #1 suggestion. Try it & see?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
please see second paragraph of https://search.googleblog.com/2016/06/google-search-autocomplete.html … about name detection. Or ask your favorite nearby SEO; it is technical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I showed it with Cupcakes... yummy delicious cupcakes...http://www.joeyoungblood.com/seo/cupcakes-disprove-sourcefeds-claim-google-manipulating-search-suggest/ …
-
ooh, good point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.