This whole story boils down to why Larry Page & Mark Zuckerberg both said "direct" access, and what that means.
-
-
Replying to @anildash
@anildash They're refuting specific claims. That language came right out of the Guardian piece: http://cl.ly/image/2S3i1g2W2R2k …3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @waxpancake
@waxpancake@anildash It's like "Allegations of behavior X!" And then "Oh, all the denials mention behavior X--suspicious‽" That's not fair.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @mattcutts
@mattcutts@waxpancake you saying the wording in every denial being absurdly consistent isn't meaningful?3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @anildash
@anildash@waxpancake and it's natural that each company acting independently would also use that phrase in their rebuttal.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattcutts
@mattcutts@anildash@waxpancake like the phase - "no secure data was compromised" for hacks? regardless of parity its an incongruent answer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkGhuneim
@MarkGhuneim I don't see that phrase in our blog post?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @mattcutts
@mattcutts btw I think the Goog has done an exceptional job making clear what happens be it this or takedown requests etc.. thank you1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkGhuneim thanks--I appreciate that. It's a lot of extra work, but definitely worthwhile.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.