Bottom line is that owning any part of a county election office backend system is a VERY powerful platform for an attacker.
-
-
-
All that said, it’s a long way from “systems were attacked” to “election was tampered with”. But still very worrisome.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
There is no reason for machine voting, not one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Targeted voter suppression might accomplish the same end more easily, and at lower risk, given we already do it to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
as we've learned vote counts don't determine the candidacy in the US.....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Based solely on the one flowchart included, there's NO confirmed (green) connection, just analyst assertion (yellow). More supposition.
-
There are literally several thousand local govt offices in the US that maintain election systems, each with its own networks and practices.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Even though they can be use to commit fraud I endorse paper ballots with a strict custody chain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since when are phishing emails an assault? Called fishing for a reason. Spam companies and Chinese do worse daily. This article is shit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They don’t need to be in order to be compromised via the system that provisions and configures them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.