If you’re doing post election RLAs on a reliable artifact of the voters’ selections, you have a terrific answer: the audit ensures that vulnerabilities could not have affected the correcness of the outcome. But without paper ballots and audits... 2/
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
... then then only response you have is to hope that there was no error in the software or vulnerability exploited. And you may or may not be right. There’s no way to know. Paper ballots and RLAs don’t eliminate bugs, they just make them irrelevant. 3/
Prikaži ovu nit -
I don’t envy election officials stuck with voting equipment and processes that don’t provide for this. They are forced to make assurances about the integrity of their elections based on untestable - and dubious - assumptions. 4/4
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
What have you found to be the best short highly summarized response to many officials' constant non-sequitur defense of "but our system is not connected to the Internet?" My longish explanations don't work.
-
That’s such a non-sequitur response, it’s hard to know where to start. Perhaps point them to the National Academies report, a highly authoritative document that explains how such systems can fail and why audits are needed regardless of whether the Internet is involved.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I once believed that too. I was wrong.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The heavy lift of State Election workers seems to be complicated by this weeks impeachment defense that suggested the Federal Government could decline to defend from form foreign attack.
-
The only viable way in is electronic. Slam the damned door.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.