It’s an unnecessary step when we already have postage free vote by mail.
-
-
-
That was my thought, too, and then I learned that the particular agency involved (King County Conservation District) somehow doesn't have access to our regular voting system. That doesn't excuse vote-by-smart-phone, of course, but it does change the context slightly.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I need to get this xkcd embossed on a cricket bat so I can whap people with it. I'll get you one too.https://xkcd.com/2030/
-
No cricket bat is large enough for the required whaping.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Link to the Seattle story itself?
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I feel like this is a very particular choice though... at this scale turnout is so much bigger a problem than fraud. There's definitely not general lessons you can take from this, but this is the kind of election that's already captured by a political machine.
-
(when you're dealing with turn out below 5%, you have bigger problems than hacking)
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I would LOVE for us to get there, someday making voting easy, convenient, and ubiquitous. But the tech is far too immature to consider doing it this decade (at least). Also: other countries achieve much higher vote participation. Without mobile phone voting.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.