Let's add the sequences now. Combining Enclosing Keycaps: [0-9#*]\ufe0f?\u20E3 (Some vendors use VS-16, some don't).
-
-
Replying to @FakeUnicode
Flags: \uD83C[\uDDE6-\uDDFF]\uD83C[\uDDE6-\uDDFF] (Ignoring the 3166-2 Subregion drama for now).pic.twitter.com/jXGrPiaO3X
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FakeUnicode
Skin tones are harder, as their applicability is very fluid. (?:[\uD800-\uDBFF][\uDC00-\uDFFF]|[\u261D-\uFFFF])\uFE0F?\uD83C[\uDFFB-\uDFFF]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FakeUnicode
This is roughly what I ended up with. This potentially finds ZWJ and sequences, but will give false positives without current Emoji data.pic.twitter.com/hEOAHm3Wfo
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FakeUnicode
This is ultimately futile and as 3166-2 subregions emoji show us, subject to gross changes in emoji sequence definitions in the future.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FakeUnicode
As
@ManishEarth points out, TR29 gives you very helpful information http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Grapheme_Cluster_Boundaries … (that is useless without staying updated).2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FakeUnicode
"Rely on 3rd-party framework/library to stay updated, for rest of your project's life" should not be only answer to "How can I easily do X?"
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @FakeUnicode
Hey
@mathias* any plans to include up-to-date http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/ data in an ES7++ \p{} properties? \p{Emoji_Keycap_Sequence}3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @FakeUnicode
Sequences are out of scope for this proposal. Only properties that expand to a simple list of code points are supported for now
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mathias
Bad example then. How about http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/emoji-data.txt … Emoji_Component, Emoji_Modifier_Base, Emoji_Modifier, Emoji_Presentation, Emoji
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Did you look at the proposal? They’re already in there
Also see https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/es-unicode-property-escapes#emoji …
-
-
Replying to @mathias
Aha! (That is why I asked, I can't keep up with everything).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FakeUnicode @mathias
Also did you see: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2017/17075-unsup-emoj-seq.pdf … The ability to predict possible ZWJs would be a bit necessary for such a feature, yeah?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
JavaScript, HTML, CSS, HTTP, performance, security, Bash, Unicode, i18n, macOS.