Any transpilers out there support ES2015 unicode code points? (babel does not) http://www.2ality.com/2015/01/es6-strings.html …
I agree with that decision. No reason to have two ways of doing the same thing, and `\u{…}\u{…}` is clearer. +@_jayphelps
-
-
why I believed it didn't work at all was because it doesn't do anything for dangling string literalspic.twitter.com/hKI263fyAO
-
can't decide if "bug" or not, considering in 99.9999999% of JS runtimes this should have no side effects
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Heh. "No reason to have two ways of doing the same thing" is like the opposite of JavaScript's effective credo.
-
(But... at least JS didn't go with \U00000000 syntax. PHEW)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
JavaScript, HTML, CSS, HTTP, performance, security, Bash, Unicode, i18n, macOS.