Write-up of CVE-2015-1287 and CVE-2015-5826: Data exfiltration abusing CSS + UTF-16, one of my greatest findings! http://blog.innerht.ml/cross-origin-css-attacks-revisited-feat-utf-16/ …
-
-
Replying to @filedescriptor
@filedescriptor “BOM is not an issue since it is discouraged according to the Unicode standard” — [citation needed]1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mathias
@mathias@filedescriptor Common claim from those who built code that pukes on the UTF-8 bom http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom5 … https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc36292 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ericlaw
@ericlaw @filedescriptor I’d love to know where it does, since apparently I’m missing something. #noBOM4lyfe
1:44 PM - 26 Apr 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
JavaScript, HTML, CSS, HTTP, performance, security, Bash, Unicode, i18n, macOS.