-
-
-
Replying to @really_bz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @mathias
@mathias@gsnedders Is that supposed to be a diff against ES5 or ES6?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz@gsnedders It’s supposed to be a diff against the latest available version.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mathias
@mathias@gsnedders That would be http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html … but then I don't get the String.prototype section of http://javascript.spec.whatwg.org/3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz@mathias The String.prototype stuff is hidious, but a few years back it was still widely enough used that Carakan had to support it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gsnedders
@gsnedders@mathias Sure. My point was that it's in ES6 as far as I can tell.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bz_moz It is now, and browsers impls are more interoperable thanks to http://javascript.spec.whatwg.org/ + bugs filed because of it. +@gsnedders
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
JavaScript, HTML, CSS, HTTP, performance, security, Bash, Unicode, i18n, macOS.