@jaffathecake @Paul_Kinlan why the need for rel="shortcut icon" rather than rel="icon"? https://developers.google.com/chrome/mobile/docs/installtohomescreen … Ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#rel-icon …
-
-
Replying to @andreasbovens
@andreasbovens@jaffathecake it is what chrome looks for based on the historical section in the spec :\3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Paul_Kinlan
@Paul_Kinlan@andreasbovens@jaffathecake Ref. http://mathiasbynens.be/notes/rel-shortcut-icon …. What makes you think Chrome looks for `rel="shortcut icon"`?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mathias
@mathias@andreasbovens@jaffathecake the code. We do accept icon too.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Paul_Kinlan
@Paul_Kinlan `shortcut` is a legacy IE thing. Browsers must support (i.e. ignore) it for back-compat, but new code shouldn’t make use of it.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Paul_Kinlan
@mathias and solely support just the word icon means we will miss a lot of existing sites1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Paul_Kinlan I’m not saying Chrome’s behavior should be changed, only that the docs should be changed to not include `shortcut` anymore
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
JavaScript, HTML, CSS, HTTP, performance, security, Bash, Unicode, i18n, macOS.