/\g/ is fine. Are you thinking of regular expressions with the `u` flag?
-
-
If you think I'm just trolling you with that question then I think that's just proof that it's been too long since we've seen each other f2f. You are actually one of a few people that might know the answer. If you think I was trolling you with the surreal bit, then, well, yes :p
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly, I was kinda expecting you to be amused by the anomaly (I mean, not really a bug) where, I think, the surrogate pair whose codepoint is an ident char is allowed as an atom escape in a context where ident chars are otherwise (explicitly) not. Guess not? Sorry about that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hm. It does to me. I'm not interested in the discussion what "real JS" is or isn't. I'm interested in implementing the spec. In the case of regexes, the spec mandates implementing three parsing modes. And I'd rather be correct in all three cases. So yes, it matters to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
JavaScript, HTML, CSS, HTTP, performance, security, Bash, Unicode, i18n, macOS.
