The problem is that every times you come up this kind of new things that’re so safe, 10 years later you always come up with sorry that it causes us ba ba ba
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That seemed more like an advertisement by those in the industry. Reminds me of Thomas Midgley and Ethyl gasoline when he would demonstrate the "safety" of Tetraethyllead. The journal, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology,documented Starlink corn not fit for human consumption.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Conspiracy theorists triggered!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Safe" is a relative and loaded term. Are GMOs necessary, or desirable? No. And the almost total opposition from industry to let an informed market decide -- by prominently and proudly labeling GMO products as such -- does not inspire confidence, trust or demand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You better go back to veteran wrestling Neil, you are getting old and deluded. Btw you don't have majors in biology and please stop flattering corporate interests. We need accurate facts and datas about the pros and cons of GMOs.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Can we genetically modify food to lower anxiety?"


somebody just give the dude some cracksThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.