The US Constitution enshrines peaceful protest and free elections, to make us a free people and keep us a free people. Today, the president of United States threatens both. It isn’t complicated at this point; the enemy is within.
-
I don't see an issue in the president "threatening", aka "cracking down upon and forbidding", violent radicals and criminals from operating out on our streets. Should such individuals seriously be protected? Or what specifically are you referring to here?
I’m not talking about “violent radicals and criminals.” I’m talking about peaceful protesters, who make up the vast vast majority of protests around the country. The right to protest is unequivocal.https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2020/06/19/police-break-rules-shooting-protesters-rubber-bullets-less-lethal-projectiles/3211421001/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.