But making it exclusively mail creates the opportunity for fraud. Otherwise, if you want to vote from home/remote, you must personally request it. Big difference.https://twitter.com/marwilliamson/status/1264750179997057031 …
No one is suggesting that it be exclusively by mail, but the option has been there and should remain. Many people need it. Efforts to destroy the postal service are another craven way to suppress the vote, by the way.
-
-
BTW, thank you for trying to run. It was unbelievable to me the dems wouldn't extend you an invite to the debates. There is great stuff you could've brought to the stage
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That does seem to be the way the media paints it.... No voting polls, too dangerous, so mail - in only. Yes, mail option has always been there. Nothing new, so I don't get the uproar. Oh yes, the media whipping up a frenzy saying it won't be safe to end lockdown by Nov
-
Not the media, Brad. Public health officials who are basing predictions on models and data from countries ahead of where we are. Colorado has an excellent voting model where everyone has an option to vote by mail if needed and there is no evidence of fraud.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.