I thought seperation of powers meant you can't force your church going beliefs into law.
-
-
-
Yes, it does. And it also means the opposite. It has a dual function.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Did you actually read what you tweeted? If they don't have the power to open them, they don't have the power to close them in the first place so why are they closed against their will?
-
Closing them for purposes of public safety is not messing with religion, it's protecting the public.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That’s... not even remotely what the separation of church and state means.
-
Sure as hell does. The first amendment to the US Constitution states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." A church choosing to remain closed for reasons of public safety is "the free exercise thereof."
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Public safety.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
This is a confusing comment based on the fact preachers have been arrested for holding services and not abiding the law of social gatherings of no more than 10 people.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/louisiana-pastor-house-arrest-after-refusing-limit-church-services-amid-n1192906 …
-
The opposite is also true. I ran a non-demonational church for six years. If I had said, "We're going to remain closed for reasons of public safety," the govt. would not have had the right to make me open it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.