It would literally be an improvement to have a president pushing crystals, orbs and homeopathy than one pushing for bleach injections and heart-attack inducing drugs that lupus patients actually need.
Show this thread
-
"we need more science to determine if vaccines are safe" is an old anti-vaxx trick, very similar to "we need more science to determine if climate change is real" or "we need more studies to determine if cigarettes *really* cause cancer." It's merchant-of-doubt stuff.
No, it’s the opposite. “Saying we need more science is an anti-vaxx trick” is actually an “anti-anyone questioning-anything-Big Pharma-says” trick. But people have memorized the line very well.
-
-
Vaccines are not some big profit drug pushed by big pharma. The science around vaccines is really, really, really well-established. It's absolutely no different from oil companies saying we just need more climate research because you just can't trust those darned scientists.
-
Bad analogy. We can’t trust climate scientists when they’re paid for by Big Oil, nor should we trust vaccine science when it’s all paid for by Big Pharma. But let’s stop now. We have bigger opponents to deal with than each other.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.