Why should we take abuse from a president that our ancestors wouldn't take from a king?
-
-
Suggestions on how to accomplish that when the corporate machine controls the public narrative?
-
Having run myself, I have an experiential understanding of exactly how that works. The answer isn’t simple because the problem itself works on a variety of levels. But the fact that so many people are getting clear about the problem is taking us closer to the solution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree, but there's a real problem. Since 1968 less than 60% of eligible adults voted in Presidential elections. Younger voters voted less than 50%. Those who don't vote in a Democracy cause it to fail.
-
Yep. And that’s what we have to change.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They didn’t have a democracy yet. They didn’t have a constitution yet. They created those for us so that we could avoid and get rid of tyrants without ever having to resort to violence.
- 3 more replies
-
-
-
But you’re ready to add countless new “departments” to this tyrannical beast.
-
“Departments” are not the problem; it’s what they’re doing and not doing that is the problem.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd love to keep it non-violent, but history tells us that the rich and powerful only give up their wealth and power through violence.
-
With one exception—our founding fathers. Washington broke that mold. Unfortunately, as time went on power was redistributed. It happens—rarely—and it never lasts. Revolution need be constant as Jefferson once posited.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.