Yeah but how do we communicate this to the affluent white suburbanites and southern black voters?
Bottom line in govt policy shouldn’t be whatever serves corporate profit. It should be whatever serves people & their ability to thrive. Shift from economic to humanitarian bottom line invigorates people AND invigorates the economy because more people will be able to participate!
-
-
-
The way we’re doing, but more elegantly and kindly at times.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed, but that’s essentially an anti-capitalist view (which is a good thing)
-
It’s actually not. It’s an argument for allowing more people to participate in a capitalist economy.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No offense but corporations are made up of a lot of people and a good economy benefits all people. If you want to talk about CEOs lining their pockets, I totally get that and agree to some extent. Corporations themselves are not bad when so many people are employed by them.
-
She didn't say corporations are bad - I think she's suggesting that a corporation's right to make money should not take precedence over the constitutional rights of the American people to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Humanitarian bottom line.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Just in case you haven’t heard the brilliance of this message...pic.twitter.com/3wZJGLZz1A
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@louisenulty@gregoldfield I feel you would love Marianne Williamson -
Oh yes...dad keeps saying people hate socialism...we just don't get it! Never will x
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Marrianne, you deserve a cabinet position.
-
What she really deserves... is the Presidency.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.