I don't know why Williamson would be chosen as a surrogate for a campaign given her prior positions not only rejecting medical science but in doing so, adding to outbreaks of another epidemic, that of measles, in the United States.https://twitter.com/murshedz/status/1234304889234153473 …
-
-
And considering you R "calling" for something which
@WHO,@CDCgov,@AmerAcadPeds and innumerable other professional orgs deem unnecessary and confusing against 7 decades of global public health data, overwhelming scientific & medical evidence, is in fact anti-vaxx. Just pls stop. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly!! You’re actually asking for more science. More science to make sure the people are even more safe. It’s amazing how that gets twisted.

-
This is misleading and dangerous. We HAVE the science that confirms that vaccines work. We HAVE 7 decades of global public health data, science, and human lives saved. To even suggest this is an unsettled issue contributes to anti-vaccine hysteria.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
When sufficient scientific review already exists and your call is intended to call the veracity of current scientific review into question whilst hindering vaccine research and approval infrastructure, then yes, it is anti-science.
-
Sufficient science does not exist. I suggest you start doing your due diligence. The pharmaceutical companies are pushing through things in the vaccines that were never there before. Things are making people sick or killing them due to lack of government regulation. Greed.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
