No, 17 year olds aren’t responsible enough to make informed decisions.
Lowering the voting age to 17 is reasonable. Those with the most at stake regarding what happens in the future should have more power to determine it.https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/08/22/california-may-allow-17-year-olds-to-vote/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook&fbclid=IwAR3CyvqoyOtq3QSdNNeCtnTAOo_qx5NXoYmQy9TuJ9DLTDoko1weYuGGXek …
-
-
-
Yet we allow them to drive and pay taxes. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I love all the comments from people not reading the title. "allowing 17 year olds to vote in primary elections...if they turn 18 before the following general". Is this seriously an issue?
-
Thank you. Marianne's tweet did not show that
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Newborns have much more at stake than 17 yr olds. They are fighting for their lives. 17 yr olds just want to get laid.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So does Marianne! They are kindred spirits these two
pic.twitter.com/nlNdHoOfDq
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
Children all over the USA can be automatically charged as adults in the criminal justice system. If a child is deemed mature enough to appreciate the consequences of her actions and, thus, charged & prosecuted as an adult, certainly she should be deemed mature enough to vote!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The human brain arguably doesn't fully mature until 26 years old. Lowering the voting age to include those fully indoctrinated by leftist public educator groupthink is literally nothing at all other than a play for more guaranteed votes in favor of a more Communist America.
-
And mental decline begins around 45 to 50. It's not a coincidence that almost all Trump voters are older than 45.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.