The corrosive idea that only corruption and perfidy could account for differences of opinion on the power dynamics of international order and America’s role therein is about what you’d expect from the hug it out candidate.https://twitter.com/marwilliamson/status/1148574113516130304 …
-
And which of your primary opponents do that - base a “national security agenda more on profits for defense contractors than on genuine peace building”? Because that accusation goes directly to my original tweet. Which you said didn’t reflect your position.
I didn’t say anything at all about my opponents, tho I said that only one other specifically mentions US military policy as an issue we should be discussing. And that that shouldn’t get one labeled something like the “hug it out” candidate. That such diminishment is undeserved.
-
-
Oh, come on. That’s precisely what you’re saying here. Their power is so great, my opponents won’t go against them.pic.twitter.com/ErU2ktK1W5
-
You can read into it what you want to read into it but my words say what my words say. This isn’t about my other opponents - it’s about the nature of the game. Not sure why you have a problem with my mentioning something that clearly you’re aware enough to recognize is true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.