Chuck Todd and the white male media decided that Donald Trump was worthy of endless free coverage and here we are.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
True. They keep saying a key factor is name recognition and then don't mention any but a few names.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hi
@chucktodd - YOUR gatekeeping media incessantly promoted trump in 2016 and is partially responsible for his election. Y’all are doing the same thing now. Even bad publicity is good, in this case. Worthy? Who appointed you? And@BreitbartNews,@marwilliamson qualified. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Spot on
@marwilliamson!! Elitist#MSM "censors" Dem candidates yet they deemed "worthy" and covered ALL of#Trump's rallies in 2016. HmmThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's with MSNBC anyway? I thought it was the progressive liberal network.
-








Look at their sponsors - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Well Chuck, we know that's bullshit because the guy that routinely fills stadiums with supporters gets little coverage-virtually none of it positive, and the ones that can't fill a coffee shop get accolades and town halls. They just have to prove their fealty to the status-quo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.