North Dakota has no voter registration, so proof of identity makes sense. But Republicans made it so that one's address had to be a residential address instead of a P.O. box knowing full well that Native Americans on reservations rely exclusively on the latter in large numbershttps://twitter.com/AriBerman/status/1049778552013541376 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @PoliticsWolf
A fair criticism, but what other than an address could prove state residency?
13 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @martyrmade
Having the state formally count Tribal ID cards that were issued to those who reside in the state. Their original ID law didn't even count tribal IDshttps://www.narf.org/cases/nd-voter-id/ …
2 replies 72 retweets 521 likes -
Replying to @PoliticsWolf
I guess my question really is, Requiring an address seems like it could be a good faith attempt to verify state residency.. Are we sure it isn't?
38 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @martyrmade @PoliticsWolf
Lol, the GOP doesn’t do anything in good faith.
6 replies 6 retweets 464 likes -
-
It is helpful. You asked the question "do we know it isn't [in good faith]?" And the question itself is laughable because the GOP hasn't operated in good faith since at least the Reagan era.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes
*yaaaaaawn*
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.