12/ Derrida (JP's chief villain) insisted that no final interpretation or statement of truth was possible because language lives with us in the real world, and changes over time. A final statement of truth today would be misunderstood tomorrow by new users of the same words.
-
-
the thread expects understanding on complex philosophical doctrine, and is aggressive with accusations of JPs ‘elementary’ understanding on relativism, who made sense on the surface level... no harm in suggesting a reply in longer form, the meth jab is harsh given the meth crisis
-
Doesn’t seem like DC ascribes to ‘turn the other cheek’
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.