Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @marty_lederman
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @marty_lederman
-
Steiner's Language & Silence volume had, and continues to have, a deep impact on me; not least in recent years, when institutions, norms, and the lessons of enlightenment once again prove to be so fragile and inadequate.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/03/books/george-steiner-dead.html …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Once again, y'all are simply underestimating the power of the presidential Sharpie. If he were so inclined, he could have congratulated Alabama for the Chiefs' win.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Probably the greatest double-bill I ever saw was on June 21, 1981, at the Bayou in D.C. Go4 was propulsive, shocking, intense, undeniable--as were the openers, an unknown band from Athens, Georgia that'd release "Radio Free Europe" less than three weeks later.
@remhq@m_millseyhttps://twitter.com/gangof4official/status/1223653715363663884 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ICYMI: *After* Lisa Murkowski made her calculation behind a veil of ignorance about what John Roberts would do on a tie vote, he unequivocally answered precisely that inquiry--and his answer was very interesting, if perhaps predictable. https://balkin.blogspot.com/2020/02/john-roberts-on-chief-justices-power-to.html …https://twitter.com/marty_lederman/status/1223559117241028608 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
3/ ... "continuing" ad bellum proportionality? That is to say, are these papers predominately for an academic audience or are they designed to have practical application--and, if the latter, how closely do they reflect actual practice?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
2/... if you have any thoughts. First, doesn't there have to be a discrete, focused ad bellum proportionality calculation w/r/t force used by A against B *in a third state C*? Second, does either of you have have any sense how, if at all, states themselves assess ....
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
1/ Thanks for this fine paper,
@eliavl--very helpful and thought-provoking. Curious whether & to what extent the forthcoming@nlubell paper will concur. It prompted at least two sub-questions that I'd be interested in hearing about from you both, ... https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3284411 …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
John Roberts on what it would have been "appropriate" for him to do in the case of any tie votes. https://balkin.blogspot.com/2020/02/john-roberts-on-chief-justices-power-to.html …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
What's the problem? It's all perfect! P.S. Mr. Bondy, your client would be "able to provide" such testimony whether or not the Senate calls him as a witness. It's called freedom of speech.https://twitter.com/josephabondy/status/1223331368618418176 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Wait: Someone's still paying attention to what the lawyers are saying? OBE.https://twitter.com/brianbeutler/status/1223346589537853441 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Self-parody alert: Best "both-sides" equivalency yet from
@nytdavidbrooks. On the one hand there's President Trump and the entire party controlling the Executive branch, Senate and SCOTUS. On the other, there's "the whole Michel Foucault legacy."https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/opinion/us-politics.html …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
That's really the best she could come up with? That the trial--controlled by the majority party of which she's a part & requiring 67 votes for conviction--can't be fair, and therefore they're better off voting without relevant witnesses & documents? Major failure of imagination.https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1223310060664782848 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Shame this wasn't published yesterday so that Cipollone could have been asked about it.https://twitter.com/nytmike/status/1223290139679567872 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
When Murkowski said she'd announce her decision this morning did she mean *Alaska* time?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
He timed it--impeachment/Brexit/coronavirus/the new Taylor Swift documentary--hoping no one would notice?https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/31/john-delaney-drops-out-2020-election-109854 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
And Harris represents 54 times more people than Lisa Murkowski, who is about to decide whether Bolton will be subpoenaed.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
A reminder of the obvious: Trump will not be removed from office, despite strong popular majorities favoring it, b/c John Barrasso, representing a population the size of Fresno, has the same vote as Kamala Harris, representing almost 70 times more people.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I know of no one--not a single person--who thinks that there was ever any serious chance that anywhere close to 20 Republicans would vote to convict. Outrage--of course. Shock? Not in the slightest. Even you so-called "Never Trumpers" made your priorities crystal clear long ago.https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1223098842310037509 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
There's no principled excuse for Bolton telling his story in six weeks but not tonight. He also knows, however, that if he told it today it would change precisely zero Republican Senators' votes--because in their eyes there's nothing especially wrong with a QPQ to harm Biden.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.