Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @martincschmalz

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @martincschmalz

  1. prije 3 sata

    as cited in Hawley PUP 1966, as cited in Roe, Journal of Financial Economics, 1990

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 3 sata

    "The destruction of private is utterly essential to avoid government socialism" FDR

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 6 sati

    "... a deal analysts suggest is worth approximately $350m based on Zomato’s most recent valuation. However, Uber itself valued its new stake at $172m."

    Poništi
  4. prije 6 sati

    Does as a common owner of various tech platforms facilitate efficient mergers that wouldn't otherwise happen due to differences in opinion about valuations?

    Poništi
  5. prije 6 sati
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. prije 6 sati
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. prije 6 sati

    Consequently, the ultimately -owned zomato-uber lays off employees (so does , whose largest shareholder is -owned as well)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. prije 6 sati

    "But all is not lost for Uber. By retaining a stake in Zomato, it'll ride the wave of success the Indian startup is enjoying - but as a backer, rather than a loss-making rival."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. prije 6 sati

    "India's food delivery market is now .. a duopoly between Zomato, backed by Alibaba, and Swiggy, backed by another Chinese tech giant - Tencent."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. prije 6 sati

    Of course the mergers could be efficient, and the realization of them aided by ! (Seems like all of them were unsustainably loss-making.)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. prije 6 sati

    You guessed it -- there's no (or little) between and . As theory predicts: differences in are less relevant to a common owner of both target and acquirer --> facilitates mergers (Academic liter.: )

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. prije 6 sati

    Interestingly, "in February 2019, Uber Eats was also in advanced talks with . However, the deal reportedly fell apart due to differences in valuation..."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. prije 6 sati

    Now withdrew from 's core markets, in exchange for a 9.99% ownership stake in its rival (which disincentivizes future re-entry or other forms of competition. That mirrors earlier withdrawal deals with commonly owned rivals in China and in SE Asia.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. prije 6 sati

    Thread: and the lessening of competition via . Setup: is a competitor of in food delivery. is both 's and 's largest shareholder; Alibaba is 's largest shareholder.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 6. velj

    (Inaccurately, actually, but they try.)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 6. velj

    Amazon's audible tracks my sleep.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. velj

    More in the popular series "Not all ETPs are made for diversification" (Actually, most aren't.)

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. velj

    Journalists, better not read this from if you are feeling outnumbered. HSBC has 447 press officers and other spinners

    Poništi
  19. 6. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 6. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·