Provided the flavor makes sense.
Poll Position: Would it be okay to carry over a mechanic between consecutive sets if they occur on different worlds? #mtgpp #WotCStaff
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
But metalcraft could have worked on say kaladesh. It has to fit that theme.
Fin de la conversation
-
-
-
If it can be flavor justified, absolutely.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Yes, if the intent is to drive home a connection between those worlds.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Poll Position? *Bad Electronic Voice* "PREPARE TO QUALIFY!"
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
This is more than a yes or no to me. It's all about execution. The way standard works makes moving them though different sets make more sense because you can make more cards supporting existing archetypes over the year. But then if it's not beloved they keep getting printed.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
You've done it before in Masques block, although obviously that was some time ago. I'd be fine seeing it again.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
If there's a story connection, I don't see why not.
-
That or in flavor of both worlds.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.