#Nullify2016 • Demand it! •They can •They should
Marks v Stinson 19 F.3d 873 (1994) "a new election was appropriate"
https://www.leagle.com/decision/199489219f3d8731759 …pic.twitter.com/TxCuHAsCr9
2016 election should be declared void ab initio, like an illegal contract. Federal courts R able 2 remove Prez fr office. Donohue v. Board of Elections, 435 F.Supp.957 (E.D.N.Y. 1976)
-
-
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
“Supreme Court has stated..all qualified voters have a constitutionally protected right to vote and to have their votes counted” “..where it was not feasible to establish who would have won a properly conducted election, a new election was appropriate..” Marks v Stinson.pic.twitter.com/7F37BFb1El
-
Did you hear this lunatic speech to the coast guard about an ally turning?? Wonder if he was talking about Flynn?? I bet he was. Hell he knows about turning...
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
This issue is the
#Constitution is silent on a fraudulent provably bogus#Election. It's only remedies are: a) the next Election b) Impeachment and/or c) 25thAmendment. Nothing else would withstand ultimate .@SCOTUS review, which would be inevitable. No? -
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
We will need good lawyers to stand up for the people & fight for election to be nullified. How do the people make this happen when a Trump removed?
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.