Members of a focus group of “undecided voters” organized by Frank Luntz, described by Politico as a “veteran Republican pollster,” were asked to describe, in one word, last evening’s Presidential “debate.” 1/11
-
-
An arrogant person makes “claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights.” Webster’s, p 116. trump pd a guy to take SAT tests 4 admission to a decent school - Fordham. His financials show he is the worst business person in U.S. history. He has not right to arrogance. 8/11
Pokaż ten wątek -
Finally: “un-American,” probably scariest term 2 apply 2 a U.S. President, but hey, he’s owned by Putin and too scared to criticize Russia’s bounties on U.S. military personnel. trump owes $400 mil to somebody; trump’s son says they borrow from Russian banks. Who knew? 9/11
Pokaż ten wątek -
GOP candidates who are “down ballot” - i.e., not running for Pres/VP - should be tossed aside if they cannot state that a man who encourages racist thugs to “stand by” needs to be removed from office. 10/11
Pokaż ten wątek -
Racists cannot run this country again I’ve voted 4 > D’s than R’s but in 2020's GOP primary I won an office - precinct committee person - from which I can help protect voters’ rights in Marion County, IN. We have to start somewhere because after last night, I want to vomit. 11/11
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.