I was a debater in high school and in college. Dr. Weiss was our coach at DePauw. He instilled in us respect for reasoned discourse - what he called “rhetoric.” Later, after law school, I coached the IUPUI debate team for several years. 2/10
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
In college debate there is an emphasis on evidence to support one’s arguments. A round consists of two 2-person teams, a judge and a time keeper. Formats varied (some competitions had cross-examination), but one thing did not: there are rules in debate. 3/10
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Violation of a rule can results in loss of a round or being tossed from a tournament. Cardinal rules concerned validity of evidence (falsify & you’re dead), respect of time limits, and shutting up while the other side speaks. 4/10
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
In 2016, the ass who currently occupies the Oval Office typified why I cringe when I watch “Presidential” debates. trump asserted without proof and often lied; he thought little of talking over Secretary Clinton. 5/10
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 2 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
I hope fire is held to people’s feet - and stop with false equivalencies. trump is destroying our country as his negligent homicide (to be kind) causes tes of thousands of deaths. If trump wants the former V.P. to take a drug test, let trump take one, too. 6/10
1 odpowiedź 2 podane dalej 4 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Only - trump would have to take it NOW. Too many times he has promised to do things - like release those lovely tax returns - only to renege. His claim of legitimacy as a businessman has been debunked. So I think we should know about the drugs. 7/10
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 4 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
A question has been raised as to whether his appointments of judges has been legitimate. I argued, in filings with the the United States Supreme Court in 2017, that the 2016 election should be nullified since trump obtained office illegitimately. 8/10
2 odpowiedzi 2 podane dalej 6 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
I don't think it matters if we have the Senate we're going to impeach every one of those m************
#impeachtrumpJudges1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @sonofnels
I agree w/end result, but I'm not sure impeachment is proper vehicle. Impeachment would be for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" Art I sec 4 or for failure to hold office "during good Behaviour" Art III sec 1 ... 1/2
2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
We do not have the rule of law where Justice is equal there is nothing in America worth saving. the English figured that out and they're King when they had to hold off the French maybe we can figure it out too.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
We need to restore the rule of law, not abandon it in the name of fighting those have sought to destroy it. The English only figured out that maintaining control over the colonies was not cost-efficient.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
That's my point no justice no peace
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.