Putin is not all bad, he is also far more complex than you think.
-
Sigh. Did I take issue with GRISWOLD? I DID NOT. I said, privacy was FINE FOR GRISWOLD. But not for ROE! Go back and read that tweet again!
You relied upon stare decisis & implied it was ignored - somehow - by a 1970s case. Our rights - & the right to privacy is bedrock - are protected. 1/3
-
-
When the Constitution was ratified, abortion was legal. It HAD been legal. That was the point of Blackmun's decision. No case specifically had ruled on it from the Court. 2/3
-
If you want to rely upon stare decisis, please tell me the Supreme Court decisions that Roe overturned in regard to a woman's right to decide. Then again, you also have to agree stare decisis doesn't bind us forever - see Dred Scott. 3/3
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Jeeze. I raised the folly of stare decisis because ROE is many decades old and hence should be safe via stare decisis....but....IS ON THE VERGE OF BEING OVER TURNED
-
You raised stare decisis in context of Roe somehow ignoring controlling concept. Roe shouldnt be overturned but neither should you abandon positions you seem to argue for - what? Momentary gain? If I'm incorrect pls tell me your original position: in favor of Roe or against? 1/2
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.