Much violence of late ‘60s was carried out by people working w/govt who sought to discredit the anti-war movement. “Prince Crazy” was an FBI informant and enjoyed creating that favorite ingredient of the far right - chaos - into otherwise peaceful protests. 12/15
Roe was based on rights as recognized in earlier cases. Griswold v Connecticut, a 1965 case, discussed the right to privacy. Hamilton argued against a "bill of rights" for fear ppl would delineate rights we had not. 1/2
-
-
I've read a bit farther in our history than the 1970s. Justice Goldberg, in concurrence in Griswold, wrote our right to privacy is protected by the 9th amendment. Read that Amendment & it might augment your undergrad ed'n.
-
Sigh. Did I take issue with GRISWOLD? I DID NOT. I said, privacy was FINE FOR GRISWOLD. But not for ROE! Go back and read that tweet again!
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.