Chaos today has been fostered by those on the right who unwittingly (they have few wits), quiver in fear at the “anarchy” and violence of the “deep state” or the “antifa.” One hell of a lot more people have been killed by the right wing, than by the left, since June. 10/15
I just returned from dinner. I'm about to go out on the deck & hope to relax a few before (maybe) rain hits. Roe's foundation is sound. Justice Blackmun wanted to address history & rights & he did both. How I arrive at what I do? Might be a different matter.
-
-
Every human I know knows Roe should not have been argued under PRIVACY. That was OK for GRISWOLD. It should have been argued under EQUAL RIGHTS. Do you even know the hugely flawed reality has been the bane of RBGs LIFE?
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
It appears again, Mark you have some basics to get clear on:https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-offers-critique-roe-v-wade-during-law-school-visit …
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
Roe became law in early 70s! What renders stare decisis moot? A case which was argued BADLY. I din even do pre law at Cornell, how come I know about this I thought eveyone educated did, and a member of the Bar does not?
-
Roe was based on rights as recognized in earlier cases. Griswold v Connecticut, a 1965 case, discussed the right to privacy. Hamilton argued against a "bill of rights" for fear ppl would delineate rights we had not. 1/2
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.