3rd Amendment: No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law is “almost never-used.” Silvera v. Lockyer, 312 F.3d 1052, 1076 (9th Cir. 2002). 1/16
Quartering of troops: so abhorred by colonists it was included in Declaration of Independence: The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment... 5/16
-
-
of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world . . . The Acts were responsible for 3rd Amend. Gerlachi, 80 The New Eng. Quart. 39 (1966), cited by Atkinson v. Gurich, 248 P.3d 356, 360 n. 22 (Okla. 2011). 6/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
W/its historical origins rooted in English Bill of Rights of 1689, 3rd Amend embodies a fundamental value: the sanctity of the home against oppressive governmental intrusion. Engblom, 677 F.2d at 966-67. 7/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
England hadn’t invaded, but sent troops to part of the British Empire. Still, ppl here were angered by the intrusion - made worse, one may infer, by character of most British soldiers who came from society’s dregs. . 8/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
We anger ppl of other countries when we send our troops to their countries. Our people might live in places other than private homes, but we are on their soil, even after we have been asked (as in Iraq) to leave. 9/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
I doubt many of us would be happy if troops of another country patrolled our streets, used (not very accurate) drones to kill our neighbors, and refused to leave. Our policies neither make us loved nor more secure. 10/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
We should cut our military spending in 1/2, withdraw troops & drones fr many places they now reside, & pursue foreign policies consistent w/Declaration of Independence & Art. I, sec. 8 of The Constitution. 11/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
A cpl of my opponents in June 2 GOP primary for U.S. House in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District (INCD5) have issued challenges to debate either any other candidate (Abernathy) or me specifically (Beckwith). 12/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
I’ve accepted the challenges, but no one has accepted. Their positions on The Constitution puts their ignorance on display. Their stands on issues are indefensible. Their support of the current occupant of the Oval Office (a/k/a “dt”) is pathetic. 13/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
We do not have to surrender 1 of the 2 major political parties to forces of ignorance and bigotry. I am the only GOP candidate in the primary who has said, & will say, policies & values of dt are reprehensible and NOT conservative. 14/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
So - contemplate history, the 3rd Amendment, & our foreign policy. People, such as Abernathy and Beckwith, who issue then duck debate challenges lack the intellectual integrity to be taken seriously. 15/16
Pokaż ten wątek -
I’m Mark Small, GOP candidate for INCD5, proudly progressive, pro-choice, pro-environment & antiwar. Those who issue debate challenges and fail to back their words with action can blow those challenges out their anal orifices. I approve of this blog. Hell, I wrote it. 16/16
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.