7.ONLY dems should be allowed to vote in primaries! Too many bad players who pose as “independents” can CHOOSE a flawed candidate ..deliberately 8.Late voting primary states actually GET NO SAY. All should be at the same time! I’m in NY and I totally hate our current system.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @laurasessions10
I agree primaries should be held at same time, but if States have primaries - & some argue that acts as subsidies for political parties - they should be open primaries. Legal barriers limit rt to vote. Tea party weaponized primaries. To counter, ppl NEED TO VOTE.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
It's the DEM party primaries, private party WHY let others decide OUR candidate??
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @laurasessions10
Because 1) the 2 major pol parties R corporations w/no ideology as Except - James Bopp, Jr has set up Indiana's GOP in a way to block ppl who might out-vote the RW 2) It'snot PRIVATE but very public Careful: Dixiecracts once held Dem Party
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
yes and the gop once were "conservative" in the old sense. But why should anyone but a voter who CARES ENOUGH to register dem get to tell us whom we should run. insane.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Indiana's primaries are open: if someone care enough to register & go to the polls that's big. Political parties as closely-held corporations = NO public input, much less control.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.