To me, that includes those who made it happen and paid for it to happen in the first place... with a much worse effect to being ignored over it.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @THCrinstam
I agree w/those points as well.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
I think too often, people are willing to search for complicated answers to simple questions, because it would, in part, destroy their world view and their minds rebel against accepting the simple answer.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @THCrinstam
& yet sometimes the simple answer is not the entire answer. United States policy in the Middle East since 1946 was part of a mindset. Our clandestine ops there did not help. How does one explain wahabi adherents w/Saudi royal family?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
The US has been engaged in a campaign for decades to keep the middle east splintered, to keep them from uniting under one leader and becoming a nation that is not only the richest in the world, but needs few others for raw materials. Which country (and it's leaders) do you
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @THCrinstam @marksmall1973
think would be in the best position to benefit from it if that did happen?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @THCrinstam
I don't know. otoh I believe our incoherent policies that rely on violence are morally wrong and, as to U.S. interests as well as peace, counter-productive. Policies based on killings by drones w/90% rate of hitting innocents is big part of why ppl hate the U.S.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
*snciker* Man, many of those places hated what the US was doing before the first drone (anywhere) flew.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @THCrinstam
I know. But we carried out clandestine ops, funded one country against an other or, the great way this country has sometimes, helped out both sides against ea other. Iran-Iraq '80-'88 is an example. Oil prices plummeted. Drones started up w/Bush II.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
The US has been supplying arms to both sides in pretty much every conflict ever, for the simple reason that they can and make money off it. In some cases they do it through 6 or 7 layers, but that is the source for most... with a second close being russia.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Russia is a distant 2nd. Let's continue this later. A main point is that U.S. policies of violence make the U.S. far less secure & are why other ppl hate the U.S. If I have stated things that make my thesis less clear, I apologize.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @marksmall1973
On that part, there is no light between our beliefs... :)
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.