Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
Judicial nominees routinely refuse to answer questions about legal precedent. -Roe v. Wade seems likely to sink. -Brown v. Board could be next. Sounds ridiculous, right? We shall see, but refusal to answer these basic questions should be disqualifying for any nominee.
Respectfully disagree: Justice Kagan wrote good law review article in mid-1990s sd can't say how U'd rule on hypothetical & cannot say about pending cases If we don't know B4? Unrealistic
Hmmm. Thanks for that. I guess I have some homework to do!
I think your friend is probably a Koch fan. Your key word was “precedent.”
Here’s a question: what about asking if they agree with prior court decisions? Those aren’t hypothetical. Or am I missing the point? 
That will elicit stmt to effect that stare decisis is principle guiding our courts, & if change is required it only is after changes in society & passage of time otherwise - go back to other 2 positions.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
