No matter an adult signature seals the deal. If he did not read it, then that is a dereliction of duty 4 the commander & chief of armed forces. He can't sign treaties or bills w/out knowledge of the law. Dereliction of duty fails the oath. If he ignores the oath he is invalidhttps://twitter.com/marksmall1973/status/1117574165907869696 …
Good point - "duty to read." That's an argument on a contract case. If I am wrong, I apologize, but I read your question as his intent, not whether he could be held to a legal standard. On the latter, you have a valid point. On the former? dt's an idiot.