"The testing by Pro V&V evaluated the voting equipment’s functionality. It didn’t grade the security of the $107 million voting system by Denver-based Dominion." https://on-ajc.com/2YZy9Tb
-
-
Afficher cette discussionMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Interesting because the Texas SOS did their own independent testing on same system (not paid for by the vendor), and six examiners unanimously turned it down. What do they know that Georgia doesn't know, or want to know.pic.twitter.com/nce3IXn7fH
-
Exactly! Plus, I don't trust the AJC's reporting either. They seem biased.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Yet the Alabama company that did the testing did NOT grade the SECURITY! I repeat DID NOT GRADE SECURITY! So why has this system received certification from the Governor? Can you get a reporter to ask him Mark???pic.twitter.com/ARqMI4fyfH
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Who was the supposed cyber security grader? Name and Credentials please!
-
And how about some reporter digging into the ownership of the company! You know- investigative journalism! Please? http://www.provandv.com/
@ajc - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
It determined the calculators can calculate . That’s a low fucking bar. “It didn’t grade the security of the $107 million voting system by Denver-based Dominion.”
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
So you vetted this company? Investors! Political affiliation!
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
This is wrong! Are you in the pocket of the voting machine company?
-
Yes.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.