Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @markmoller

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @markmoller

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    21. lip 2018.

    When I encounter someone particularly disagreeable, harsh or aggressive on social media, I often go to their profile searching for some semblance of their humanity. I read their posts/tweets, look at photos and just generally try to get a sense of them. 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 31. sij

    As always, the above is non-prescriptive and merely offered for contemplation.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 31. sij

    This approach likely only has merit if the (non-bot/troll) actor has interest in a real exchange but it perhaps redirects a binary (right/left-right/wrong-good/bad) into a potentially more revealing and interesting direction. It could (could!) require/enlist deeper thought. Maybe

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    At parrying the (likely) bad faith effort but I wonder if an alternative is to challenge any such request with a response to articulate their criteria for judging any such evidence — what will they utilize to discern whether given evidence has merit/value/validity? 6/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 31. sij

    That this evidence would be either accepted or declined (the latter being most likely). From an argument “strength” perspective, I am less interested in the evidence as I am the criteria — by what criterion/ia would any evidence offered be judged. Mr. Moxon was quite adept 5/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    Conclusion(s). For example, I consistent find ’s arguments to be well constructed (even if I don’t agree with the conclusions per se). Earlier, I was observing an exchange with a questioner of Mr. Moxon who was requesting “proof” of something — with the implication 4/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    Intriguing is less about whether a given argument is agreeable or disagreeable — that is almost always my first lense — but whether I can discern how someone is constructing a given argument. I am vastly more interested in an argument’s nature/structure/premises than its 2/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    I am generally an observer on Twitter —unless I feel that my particular brand of snark and sarcasm can enlighten or entertain (myself) in which case I am occasionally a commenter instead of an instigator. Most often I am observing argument and what I find most 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Day 3 of 12 RT & follow for a chance to win this jersey

    Poništi
  10. 20. velj 2019.

    The 7-year old: “What’s a psychic?” The Mama: “Some one who can read minds.” The 7- year old: “ Well, that’d be easy because for me it’s all 🌈 and 🦄!”

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. velj 2019.

    I love Behavioral Grooves Podcast | Rodd Wagner: This Episode Could Save Your Life, let's play it!

    Poništi
  12. 9. velj 2019.

    Tweets that happen when your 7-year Old has your phone.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 9. velj 2019.

    I gust saved the princess

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I know you're disappointed I know you're frustrated I know you're fed up I know you're numb I know you're angry I know you're sad I know you're tough I know you're resilient I know you're resistant I know you're persistent I know you're determined I know you're indestructible

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. ruj 2018.

    If you want to IMPROVE HOW YOU THINK and MAKE DECISIONS and LAUGH while learning about it - then you should listen to this podcast with on Behavioral Grooves.

    Poništi
  16. 25. ruj 2018.

    Tech industry steal this idea: Anti-Twitter app: Pollyannish, feel-good stories and positive portrayals of people of all ideological stripes. Only good news. Highly regulated so only non-vitriolic and civil speech allowed. 🌈 fairies 🧚🏻‍♀️ and 🦄 galore.

    Poništi
  17. 27. kol 2018.

    I love social science. It’s a useful and valuable pursuit. But human beings are not molecules and atoms and do not behave in predictable and patterned ways — to the degree that other phenomena do. Our expectations need to be adjusted not the attempt to study.

    Poništi
  18. 25. kol 2018.
    Poništi
  19. 10. srp 2018.

    A modest proposal: 99.99% of “what about” answers in social media “debates” simply be accepted as concurrence with charge/point thus saving a great deal of angst/thumb typing. Sample: P1: So and so is doing such and such. P2: Well, what about so and so?! P1: TY for agreeing.

    Poništi
  20. 21. lip 2018.

    I can choose to see them as more than their beliefs, words and even actions. I can choose to see them as human beings of fundamental worth. That may be my privilege talking. So be it. I make no prescriptions for others. This is my calling. My challenge.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 21. lip 2018.

    Human beings who are flawed, broken and who’ve perhaps been so hurt by the world and their experience(s) in it that they in turn feel they can and must inflict hurt on others. I find some of their beliefs, words and even actions abhorrent but I choose not to give in. 7/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·