Mark Lemley
Yana Welinder
Bad news. MT @marklemley: Oracle v. Google: (c) for structure, sequence & organization of computer programs is back. http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1021.Opinion.5-7-2014.1.PDF …
Oracle v. Google is reversed; copyright for the structure, sequence and organization of computer programs is back. http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1021.Opinion.5-7-2014.1.PDF …
-
-
-
@marklemley Do you think the theory is just that the SCt can't reverse them all? -
@rtushnet@marklemley pasta. throw it all against the wall & see what sticks. -
@lquilter At least they're not shy: "Hey we created a split with Lotus, which you granted cert on back in the day. Thoughts?" -
@rtushnet not like the roberts court is shy about revisiting/rev*ing
-
-
FFS you idiots. MT
@marklemley Oracle v. Google is reversed; copyright for APIS is back. http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1021.Opinion.5-7-2014.1.PDF … -
-
@marklemley@mortman oh. crap. -
@Dr_Memory@marklemley Indeed….
-
-
@marklemley@timbray WOSE? Write Once Sue Everywhere. -
@marklemley@sarahjeong@BenL So… on which courts is a Fed Cir © decision binding, exactly? Only cases where there's also a patent claim?
Rebecca Tushnet
Laura M Quilter
Eleanor Saitta
Doctor Memory
David
Jeff Ratcliff
delrayser
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.