I love that no one is polluting the global scope these days. I can add whatever I want to it doesn't conflict.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You can pry my ripped-from-early-2000s-Ruby `describe()` from my cold dead hands, Mark
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
i have so many permits for bad practices. git push —force to master? have a permit. gnarly inline css? several permits. im pretty sure being a senior dev just means you can convince your colleagues that *anything* is the right choice even if you know it isn’t
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
guilty as charged
-
the global scope is mine to pollute and mine alone
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What if I'm writing a babel parser that stores lexical scope in the global scope
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I have one package which writes to `global`, but it only creates a non-enumerable property keyed to a `Symbol.for` to ensure a singleton is used even if multiple instances of the module are loaded. I'd be open to other ways to deal with this sort of thing.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
CSS Modules co-creator,
OSS / UI / design / tooling at 

