You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
#KavanaughConfirmationHearings are an embarrassing indictment of our current political culture. Deranged claims from the left that a highly credentialed long time circuit judge is a threat to our republic. The bad acting job by some Senators who know better.
The D.C. bubble & radical left wing activists may be cheering you on. But back on planet earth you are embarrassing yourselves with unhinged disruptions,gotcha questions that disprove your attacks & claims of gladiator like bravery for releasing documents that were already public
Why would you appoint a judge that believed a president is ABOVE THE LAW? Why would you appoint a judge that poses a danger to women's reproductive rights, minorities, civil rights, labor rights? #NoToKavanaugh
Maybe you should actually watch the hearing
I have been. Rushing to appoint without access to the nominee's full record is abnormal. Refusal to recuse himself after speaking with Trump's legal team about the Mueller investigation is unacceptable. I am looking for my Senators' "no" votes!
His name was put forth over 30 days ago and all of his rulings are public. Didn't have time? #RollsEyes
Longer than 30, almost 60. See historical timelines and it shows no “rush,” more like average timeline. Will end up being a vote about the same time as Sotomayor did.pic.twitter.com/u9i38VLKub
The unwillingness to recuse and the missing information are if greatest concern. Especially the former given the current situation.
I wasn’t weighing in on an opinion either way, just pointing out facts. My eyes aren’t tinted with either party’s lens, so I look objectively. I merely pointed out that the “rush” was, in fact, not a rush. #justthefacts
A rush job by definition is something created quickly, urgently, or without due care. The issues for some is the perception of lack of due care/diligence. In which case "rush" is appropriate.
So, you’re cool with birth control being characterized as “abortion inducing drugs”? Good to know.
He does. Pesky science.
Ummm. There's a morning after pill. There are also pills that prevent ovulation. There are IUDs that prevent implantation. There's LOTS of science and best that people who are going to legislate women's access to health care fully understand all of it.
Preventing implantation of a fertilized egg (which is now a human by definition) is a first trimester abortion. Any high school biology book can teach you that. So morning after pill is an abortive drug and an IUD is an abortive device. Americans need to learn more science.
Most forms of birth control, including IUD’s, release low levels of progesterone. This prevents fertilization, not implantation of a fertilized egg, by preventing ovulation by making the body think it’s already pregnant. Birth control does not=abortion...
Drug eluting IUD ‘primary’ method is releasing progesterone to thicken mucus and to reduce ovulation frequency, it does not prevent fertilization. The mechanical effect of IUD prevents implantation it DOES =abortion. Once you finish medical school like me will talk again
But if you are basing your discussion about birth control on your religious beliefs, we'll just call it a day.
Hey Marco, I am one of your constituents. This Tweet is as disturbing as some of #45's and they way you reacted to Alex Jones. Maybe you need to retire prior to being voted out of office.
Perhaps we should start a fund like they did for Susan Collins to show Rubio we really will have a huge grass roots effort to ensure he gets voted out when his time comes.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
