Who cares? More dogs. And don’t make me wait years and then post a picture of a thinner, lighter animal. I need a Pro dog.
The difference between light-load and heavy-load battery life is staggering.http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/11/review-cheapest-2016-macbook-pro-is-good-but-its-missing-all-the-cool-stuff/4/ …
-
-
-
Apple would put out an Italian Greyhound with no teeth, and no tail, and say "but look how thin it is!"
-
Which is a funny because I adore Italian greyhounds. It’s true; they’re all good dogs.
-
-
it’s optimized for the pro use case of randomly browsing the web
-
-
which is why the 10hour battery life claims are always suspect. ppl really need to stop using them as justification.
-
one thing I would bet serious $ on is that half the 10hr quoted time wasn’t spent compiling Xcode projects
-
-
the MacBook Esc is the fabled retina MacBook Air. The strange part is the “Pro” branding.
-
i wonder what 5x the battery would weigh.
-
The heavy-load isn’t that much lower; probably a wash in real-world time doing development
-
-
Just wait for the MacBook Pro battery case that adds a hump on the back.
- 1 more reply
-
-
without some sort of measure of how much "work" was done, the battery life under load is useless.
-
same with iPhones
-
you really is trying hard to trash the MacBook Pro
-
that can surely get worse with the 15" model and another 35W of dGPU. Hopefully WebGL isn't representative of the real world.
-
gonna need more dogs after reading that
-
16 hours under light load is magnificent, though.
-
At this point, I think I need a dog-based comparison.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.