This is despicable. RT @marco_org: → Facebook tinkered with users’ feeds for a massive psychology experiment http://www.marco.org/2014/06/28/facebook-psychology-experiment …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marco_org FB could not have reached the same conclusion using an observational study. Randomization removes many hidden variables.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marco_org the link in your article misses the bias in the observational design he suggests. What fb did is better science, if worse ethicsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marco_org @Sneagan Should be surprising to no one; Should also surprise no one if this story turned out to be manipulative misinformationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marco_org to say that the read only analysis would yield equivalent results is incorrect. It's why randomized trials exist. -
@marco_org that's causal inference 101. Not trying to be rude, but that's a misleading thing to share to your large audience.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.