@marclauritsen Ahem. @Suffolk_Law ?! @SuffolkLawTech
Is the displacement (and enhancement!) of human lawyers by artificial systems prominent in any law school's curriculum?
-
-
-
.
@GTeninbaum@Suffolk_Law,@MSULaw,@ChicagoKentLaw etc deserve praise, but even these just serve electives to small#s of students
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@marclauritsen Define "prominent" ;-) -
.
@johnpmayer I was thinking something like 'standing out as among the subjects all students should be familiar with'
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@marclauritsen I don't know if prominent is the right word, but we had some of that while I was at@MSULaw '09-'12.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marclauritsen no and won't until ABA requires it and ABA won't do that until profession demands, which PROF. won't do until actually used.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marclauritsen ...and it's going to be a long time until the legal profession is comfortable with the use of artificial systems.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marclauritsen#chickenoregg? Imo students w/ legal tech knowledge = faster change than waiting for practitioners. Let's make required!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.